Per the reader’s request, I asked Michael Egnor to “defend the reality of objectively real morals.”
It was, and is, the most controversial Catholic document of the past century, and perhaps of any century.
“Cosmopsychism might seem crazy,” says philosopher Phillip Goff, “but it provides a robust explanatory model for how the universe became fine-tuned for life.”
Of the various questions raised in the theist/atheist debate, here’s one that has, I believe, occasioned more witless commentary than any other.
Ian O’Neill discusses origin-of-life research, and bizarrely restricts the explanations to “fluke” or “physics.”