Mike and Andrew have a good time considering the range of ways in which the preemptive, prepublication review fell short.
Not content with ripping Dr. Behe, Professor Lents now seeks to assassinate my character. Try to follow his logic if you can.
The dispute started when a review in Science proposed the 2012 article by Näsvall et al. as evidence against Mike Behe’s book Darwin Devolves.
He is waiting patiently for them to catch up.
Swamidass’s response doesn’t address our main arguments, but he indicates he is impressed by what Darwinian mechanisms accomplished in generating chloroquine resistance.