Tag: Nathan Lents
Polar Bear Seminar: New Evidence That Michael Behe Is Right
Many studies show that degradative mutations in APOB cause decreased cholesterol.
Muller Two-Step Model: A Refutation of Behe on Irreducible Complexity?
Our responses to the Muller two-step have been around for a long time; it would be nice if ID critics would recognize and perhaps answer them.
Polar Bear Seminar: On Retracting — and Not Retracting — Errors
It was Nathan Lents himself who wrote, “I’ve made mistakes, some I caught, others someone else caught. I always correct it the best I can. That’s what honest people do.”
Polar Bear Seminar: A Fake Scandal About a Chart
The criticisms keep coming. It’s hard to keep up. Lents, in fact, just yesterday added additional commentary on Behe’s use of the chart.
Polar Bear Seminar: Unacknowledged Discrepancies, Inconsistent Standards
The discrepancy in method is crucial to understanding this argument against Behe. Yet curiously, it is omitted from mention by Lents and Hunt. Why?