One might add that this analysis applies to the world of life as a whole.
At a debate in Chicago between Dawkins and Bret Weinstein, I witnessed something that I never thought I’d see.
Oh, it’s very difficult to concede that you were mistaken about something. Especially, I would say, for males.
As Denyse O’Leary asks, “Why is it comparatively easy to develop a program to play chess, as opposed to teaching a robot to walk freely?”
It’s strikes me that this is a difference between design and Darwinian thinking.