Design with interdependent layers presents a challenge to neo-Darwinism. Natural selection is oblivious to anything but an immediate beneficial variation.
The argument about whales turns on two points: “Population genetics calculations say no,” and “New fossil find throws the series into disarray.”
Are there rumblings of discontent? Is it getting safer to question the claims of conventional neo-Darwinism?
Here is one more reason among many to take a hard, honest look at the growing scientific evidence against Darwinian theory.
What do scientists spend more time thinking about — sex, or the theory of intelligent design?