Despite Mr. Farina’s smug condescension and patronizing demeanor, he fails to mount a credible critique of Dr. Behe’s thesis.
The issues involved in the evolution debate derive their interest and importance largely from one question.
The purposes of medicine are expanding rapidly beyond treating actual illnesses/injuries and promoting wellness.
“I’ve long admired Discovery’s courageous work on intelligent design,” said Olasky.
How is any of this constitutional? How do these discriminatory guidelines not break federal civil rights laws?