Most journalists who write about evolution appear to have made their choice to be flacks and toadies for the godlike biologists.
To summarize, the authors use a terrible design hypothesis, and make ever-escalating claims of certainty from two weak observations.
While others demand crackdowns on “fake news,” the Society reminds us that the history of science is one of error correction.
The student, who attends a public university, is worried about how this kind of indoctrination bodes for the future. I am too.
Protesting such a thing, not protesting against the people who protest against it, should be the norm, not the rare exception.