This “experiment” was very wrong on at least four fronts. First, it created human life for the purpose of experimenting upon it.
If “nature rights” laws become widespread, there will be plenty of money to pay lawyers to sue developers and resource-using enterprises into the dirt.
Back in 2008, Science published an influential research article claiming evidence for a physiological basis behind differences in political views.
Dr. Marks thinks it’s possible that AI may improve in its ability to resolve ambiguous language. Right now it’s not looking so good.
Take a look at a plant that takes nothing but gives everything. Why should it deliver so much good to so many?