What can be said of Darwin and the Darwinian Revolution in the dusk of 2009, fifty year after its original publication? Is it a terrible book?
There is some evidence that once again, the diapason of opinion is being changed. The claims of intelligent design are too insistent and too plausible to be frivolously dismissed.
Phillips draws a helpful parallel between intolerant leftism, in command in our culture now, and the evolutionism that similarly will tolerate no challenges.
Restoring man’s image is functionally equivalent to restoring the tradition of great thought and great writing.
Darwinian fairy tales about prehistoric Neanderthal proclivities and modern psychology are obvious junk science.