Natural selection, if understood as undirected variation and differential reproductive success, is a destructive process.
Most Darwinists are far savvier in how they seek to persuade the public.
Thanks to Professor P.Z. Myers, here’s a glimpse into the ideological corruption of modern biology.
The statement that “scientists call” this group “fundamentalist and/or evangelical” makes it sounds as if that is an objective, scientific label.
What can be said of Darwin and the Darwinian Revolution in the dusk of 2009, fifty year after its original publication? Is it a terrible book?