An email correspondent who is friendly to intelligent design (ID) recently wrote us asking how to respond to common objections to ID arguments about the Cambrian explosion.
Such explosions and revolutions dominate the history of life, which was rather a series of abrupt saltations than the gradual change predicted by Darwinism.
Are there rumblings of discontent? Is it getting safer to question the claims of conventional neo-Darwinism?
Where do you think your curious kids will look for answers to their questions about the world — in the local bookstore or online?
A new statistical study of impacts on the moon concludes that the appearance of an increase was an artifact of biased sampling.