If this is the best answer evolutionists can come up with, it’s game over for Darwinism.
Darwin himself could take refuge in an “Evolution of the Gaps” scenario where confirmation of his theory would emerge with time. Modern Darwinists don’t have that luxury.
So, do high levels of cholesterol biomarkers really suggest an animal affinity of Dickinsonia?
Boodin’s view that science and metaphysics could mutually inform one another was full of promise.
Dawes and Smith say they’re simply describing (as a “matter of fact”) the history of science.