Though the journal has published a couple of papers in recent years that are sympathetic to ID, I know of no direct evidence that this journal itself is friendly to ID.
As anyone knows who’s followed the popular Darwinist blogging sites, Darwinism is an ideological movement seemingly rich in believers unhindered by responsibilities to family or work.
Lönnig’s publications show that experimental research on plant breeding can have positive implications for intelligent design.
Impressive evidence of scientists who don’t support ID but who do trash the primary Darwinian thesis.
Hot-button scientific topics have been politicized. Not by Republicans, however.