Skip to content
Evolution News Logo

EVOLUTION NEWS

& SCIENCE TODAY

Menu
  • Science
      • EvolutionEvolution
      • MedicineMedicine
      • Human OriginsHuman Origins
      • Neuroscience and MindNeuroscience & Mind
      • Intelligent DesignIntelligent Design
      • Physics, Earth, and SpacePhysics, Earth & Space
      • Life SciencesLife Sciences
    Close
  • Culture
      • Culture & EthicsCulture & Ethics
      • NewsmediaNews Media
      • EducationEducation
      • Faith & ScienceFaith & Science
      • Free SpeechFree Speech
    • Close
  • Writers
      • andrew-mcdiarmid-headshotAndrew McDiarmid
      • Bioinformation SymposiumDenyse O’Leary
      • beheMichael Behe
      • paul-nelson-headshotPaul Nelson
      • wittJonathan Witt
      • ann-gauger-headshotAnn Gauger
      • douglas-axe-headshotDouglas Axe
      • michael-denton-headshotMichael Denton
      • stephen-meyer-headshotStephen Meyer
      • chaffee-1Sarah Chaffee
      • david-berlinski-headshotDavid Berlinski
      • john-west-headshotJohn West
      • egnorMichael Egnor
      • smithWesley Smith
      • aldrichRachel Adams
      • david-klinghoffer-headshotDavid Klinghoffer
      • wellsJonathan Wells
      • dr_brian_miller_headshot-22Brian Miller
      • michael-flannery-headshotMichael Flannery
      • en-orange-boxEvolution News
    • Close
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Donate
  • About
  • Spanish Edition
  • 02.22.19
  • |
  • Search

Tag: peer-review

Casey Luskin
April 10, 2015, 3:48 AM

Neo-Darwinism’s Catch-22: Before Evolving New Features, Organisms Would Be Swamped by Genetic Junk

A new peer-reviewed paper in the journal Complexity presents a computational model of evolution.

Casey Luskin
March 18, 2015, 4:42 PM

Another Successful Prediction of Intelligent Design: Cell Paper Reports Functions for Synonymous Codons

ID expects that we should find deeper and deeper layers of function in biology, which by the same token represents a big problem for Darwinian evolution.

Casey Luskin
January 23, 2015, 4:31 AM

In Light of New BIO-Complexity Paper, Maintaining Neo-Darwinism Means Rejecting Established Methods of Historical Science

The typical response from evolutionists is that perhaps ancient enzymes were different, and more readily mutable to acquire new functions.

Casey Luskin
January 22, 2015, 10:51 AM

Biologic Institute’s Groundbreaking Peer-Reviewed Science Has Now Demonstrated the Implausibility of Evolving New Proteins

Darwin observed that his theory “breaks down” when large leaps of complexity are needed in order to provide some advantage.

Casey Luskin
December 20, 2014, 4:55 AM

Paper Suggests Catch 22: Neo-Darwinism Faces Either a Massive Molecular Clock Misfire, or a Major Biogeographical Conundrum

Molecular clocks are notoriously unreliable indicators of a lineage’s evolutionary age.

Posts navigation

Prev Page1 Page2 Page3 Page4 Page5 Page6 … Page13 Next

Trending

  • A Dentist in the Sahara: Doug Axe on the Rarity of Proteins Is Decisively Confirmed
  • In the Controversy over Intelligent Design, Seeking Genuine Dialogue
  • Seeking Racial Reconciliation in the Heart of Texas at a Screening of Human Zoos
  • At Last, the Details of How Proteins Evolve?
  • Perplexing: Michael Behe’s Critics Falsely Claim He Ignores Exaptation

Recommended

  • The ID Underground and Other Reflections
  • Is Biology Approaching the Threshold of Design?
  • Genetics, Epigenetics: New Problems for Darwinism
  • Of Lunar Eclipses and the Dark Ages Myth
  • Michael Behe’s Marshall McLuhan Moment
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Donate
  • About
  • Privacy
  • Search
© 2019 Discovery Institute