Tag: peer-review
Another Successful Prediction of Intelligent Design: Cell Paper Reports Functions for Synonymous Codons
ID expects that we should find deeper and deeper layers of function in biology, which by the same token represents a big problem for Darwinian evolution.
In Light of New BIO-Complexity Paper, Maintaining Neo-Darwinism Means Rejecting Established Methods of Historical Science
The typical response from evolutionists is that perhaps ancient enzymes were different, and more readily mutable to acquire new functions.
Biologic Institute’s Groundbreaking Peer-Reviewed Science Has Now Demonstrated the Implausibility of Evolving New Proteins
Darwin observed that his theory “breaks down” when large leaps of complexity are needed in order to provide some advantage.
Paper Suggests Catch 22: Neo-Darwinism Faces Either a Massive Molecular Clock Misfire, or a Major Biogeographical Conundrum
Molecular clocks are notoriously unreliable indicators of a lineage’s evolutionary age.
Peer-Reviewed Science: What the Field of Systems Biology Can Tell Us About Intelligent Design
“‘Reverse engineering’ would seem to imply that there was ‘engineering’ in the first place.”