Tag: peer-review
Neo-Darwinism’s Catch-22: Before Evolving New Features, Organisms Would Be Swamped by Genetic Junk
A new peer-reviewed paper in the journal Complexity presents a computational model of evolution.
Another Successful Prediction of Intelligent Design: Cell Paper Reports Functions for Synonymous Codons
ID expects that we should find deeper and deeper layers of function in biology, which by the same token represents a big problem for Darwinian evolution.
In Light of New BIO-Complexity Paper, Maintaining Neo-Darwinism Means Rejecting Established Methods of Historical Science
The typical response from evolutionists is that perhaps ancient enzymes were different, and more readily mutable to acquire new functions.
Biologic Institute’s Groundbreaking Peer-Reviewed Science Has Now Demonstrated the Implausibility of Evolving New Proteins
Darwin observed that his theory “breaks down” when large leaps of complexity are needed in order to provide some advantage.
Paper Suggests Catch 22: Neo-Darwinism Faces Either a Massive Molecular Clock Misfire, or a Major Biogeographical Conundrum
Molecular clocks are notoriously unreliable indicators of a lineage’s evolutionary age.