Skip to content
Evolution News Logo

EVOLUTION NEWS

& SCIENCE TODAY

Menu
  • Science
      • EvolutionEvolution
      • MedicineMedicine
      • Human OriginsHuman Origins
      • Neuroscience and MindNeuroscience & Mind
      • Intelligent DesignIntelligent Design
      • Physics, Earth, and SpacePhysics, Earth & Space
      • Life SciencesLife Sciences
    Close
  • Culture
      • Culture & EthicsCulture & Ethics
      • NewsmediaNews Media
      • EducationEducation
      • Faith & ScienceFaith & Science
      • Free SpeechFree Speech
    • Close
  • Writers
      • andrew-mcdiarmid-headshotAndrew McDiarmid
      • Bioinformation SymposiumDenyse O’Leary
      • beheMichael Behe
      • paul-nelson-headshotPaul Nelson
      • wittJonathan Witt
      • ann-gauger-headshotAnn Gauger
      • douglas-axe-headshotDouglas Axe
      • michael-denton-headshotMichael Denton
      • stephen-meyer-headshotStephen Meyer
      • chaffee-1Sarah Chaffee
      • david-berlinski-headshotDavid Berlinski
      • john-west-headshotJohn West
      • egnorMichael Egnor
      • smithWesley Smith
      • aldrichRachel Adams
      • david-klinghoffer-headshotDavid Klinghoffer
      • wellsJonathan Wells
      • dr_brian_miller_headshot-22Brian Miller
      • michael-flannery-headshotMichael Flannery
      • en-orange-boxEvolution News
    • Close
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Donate
  • About
  • Spanish Edition
  • 02.16.19
  • |
  • Search

Tag: peer-review

Casey Luskin
July 18, 2014, 5:37 AM

Peer-Reviewed Science: What the Field of Systems Biology Can Tell Us About Intelligent Design

“‘Reverse engineering’ would seem to imply that there was ‘engineering’ in the first place.”

Casey Luskin
July 17, 2014, 5:30 AM

When Biologists Think Like Engineers: How the Burgeoning Field of Systems Biology Supports Intelligent Design

What if many scientists are doing this and they don’t even realize it?

Casey Luskin
June 2, 2014, 4:04 AM

Peer-Reviewed Paper: Development Needs Ontogenetic Information that Cannot Arise from Neo-Darwinian Mechanisms

Papers like this show that when freed from the “central dogmas” of neo-Darwinian evolution, a theory of intelligent design can open up promising and fruitful avenues of research and thinking.

Casey Luskin
April 18, 2014, 4:59 AM

Latest BIO-Complexity Paper Finds that on Irreducible Complexity, Michael Behe Has Not Been Refuted

“Behe’s concept of irreducible complexity has not been falsified by computer models.”

Casey Luskin
April 7, 2014, 5:08 AM

BIO-Complexity Paper: Why Chaitin’s Mathematical “Proof” of Darwinian Evolution Fails

There are many reasons why Chaitin’s model does not accurately reflect how Darwinian evolution works, if it does work, in the real world.

Posts navigation

Prev Page1 Page2 Page3 Page4 Page5 Page6 Page7 … Page13 Next

Trending

  • Darwinists Devolve: Review by Swamidass, Lenski, and Lents Borders on Fraud
  • Ben Shapiro Rethinks Life’s Origins — Applauds Meyer’s Signature in the Cell
  • Why Discovery Institute Has Asked Some Scientists Not to Sign the Darwin Dissent List
  • Happy Darwin Day! Here’s a Video Introduction to Signers of Scientific Dissent from Darwin List
  • Cited to Attack Darwin Devolves, Study Devolves on Close Inspection

Recommended

  • The ID Underground and Other Reflections
  • Is Biology Approaching the Threshold of Design?
  • Genetics, Epigenetics: New Problems for Darwinism
  • Of Lunar Eclipses and the Dark Ages Myth
  • Michael Behe’s Marshall McLuhan Moment
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Donate
  • About
  • Privacy
  • Search
© 2019 Discovery Institute