Tag: peer-review
What it Means to Be “Pro-ID”
Defending either theory, Darwin or Design, means you have to argue for your explanation and against others.
At North Dakota State University, Presenting the Positive Case for Design
Two issues of note dominated the Q&A: the Type III Secretory System (T3SS) as a supposed evolutionary precursor to the bacterial flagellum, and whether the Cambrian explosion really was an actual event in the history of life.
Answering Objections about Discovery Institute’s Peer-Review Page
Apparently a critic had said that the papers don’t count because some don’t specifically use the term “intelligent design.”
The GULO Pseudogene and Its Implications for Common Descent
The GULO pseudogene may or may not turn out to harbor some sort of function.
Even the Cell’s Dumpster Is an Intricate Machine
“Correctly dismantling a structure can be as challenging as assembling it. ”