On Monday, I will look at the consistency of the phylogenetically informative sites for the Baum et al. (2016) paper. Spoiler alert: It looks like design.
Only the infusion of new information from outside the system can explain these bursts of biological creativity.
These incongruent or homoplastic characters are a notorious problem for phylogenetics and contradict the evolutionary prediction of a nested hierarchy.
Evolutionists have all the evidence they need in genes and morphology to draw the one true tree of life. Or do they?
Compare the latest project to sequence everything to other megaprojects that may or may not answer evolutionary questions.