A new study claims that “natural selection” is making society more unequal because it is favoring those with poorer education and lower earnings.
There is a major effort in medical education today to indoctrinate students and resident physicians into Critical Theory.
I respect Coyne’s position, but, lacking his faith, I interpret this evidence more naturally as pointing to an ingenious mind.
Jerry Coyne thinks that criminals don’t have a “choice.” (What are those quotation marks doing there?)
What’s the pivot that turns us toward more traditional solutions, versus the wrongly named “progressive” ones?