There is a major effort in medical education today to indoctrinate students and resident physicians into Critical Theory.
I respect Coyne’s position, but, lacking his faith, I interpret this evidence more naturally as pointing to an ingenious mind.
Jerry Coyne thinks that criminals don’t have a “choice.” (What are those quotation marks doing there?)
What’s the pivot that turns us toward more traditional solutions, versus the wrongly named “progressive” ones?
Countering “flat universe theory” is Gilder’s enterprise, and it captures much of what we do at Discovery Institute.