How does information theory challenge Darwinian evolution? And how can the methods of probability be used to assess key evolutionary claims?
Croft ultimately had the worse of the argument on substance, as I intend to show over several forthcoming posts.
In analysis of fine-tuning, No Free Lunch Theorems, and conservation of information, Bernoulli’s PrOIR is foundational.
Novella and Goff invoke “multiple everything” while at the same time defining “everything” in a way that precludes observation. Nonsense has its uses.
Elaborate schemes to explain the origin of the genetic code from the laws of physics and chemistry miss the whole point about codes.