Equipping people to be “their own science referees” is a large part of the mission of the intelligent design movement.
As our dialogue continues, I think I’m starting to understand your position more clearly.
From childhood, we all naturally ascribe things like spiders and hummingbirds to a “God-like designer.” But are we right to do this?
Previously, I questioned a theistic evolutionist’s claim that we can’t rule out chance as an explanation for something unless the probability of chance working can be calculated accurately.
This is the seventh part of my ongoing conversation about Undeniable with theistic evolutionist Hans Vodder.