To his credit, William Lane Craig is among those evangelicals who have been willing to question arguments against Adam and Eve.
It’s simply false for Dawkins to claim that when you compare genes of different animals, they “fall on a perfectly hierarchy — a perfect family tree.”
An observation that supports a non-natural origin is that the pigment appears only in a small, conspicuous location.
Some defenders of evolutionary orthodoxy would have us believe that we’ve only found a handful of non-coding DNA sequences that have function.
Are there rumblings of discontent? Is it getting safer to question the claims of conventional neo-Darwinism?