Surely, genuine “skepticism” is not a position one takes, but rather an approach to evaluating claims.
“Neuromania” has led the media to continuously print stories about how some “new discovery” has finally demonstrated a purely material basis for consciousness.
Let’s take a moment to recall the realities of the world of science.
An email correspondent writes to us noting his recent experience attending “Darwin on the Palouse” out at Washington State University.
Apparently a critic had said that the papers don’t count because some don’t specifically use the term “intelligent design.”