ID licenses scientists to be curious about non-conserved biological redundancy and to investigate the possibility that biological redundancy is purposeful.
If computer scientists build systems like that, and life at the DNA level also incorporates them, for the very same reasons, that’s rather suggestive.
Are there rumblings of discontent? Is it getting safer to question the claims of conventional neo-Darwinism?
The 4-4-4 rule says that we would perish without oxygen for four minutes, water for four days, or food for four weeks.
Whenever a complex system of systems works at all, it seems counterproductive to attempt a “bad design” argument.