A much better approach would be no religion in biology class, and more science.
Dawes and Smith say they’re simply describing (as a “matter of fact”) the history of science.
Newton was arguing from science, not religion. But that doesn’t fit the Epicurean mythos that religion opposes naturalism while science confirms it.
The LSEA demonstrates that we don’t have to teach evolution dogmatically in public schools.
Any genuine understanding of the impact AI will have (and is having) on humanity must begin with Girard.