“Scientists do love a good story,” says Keas. “Turns out there are plenty of stories we shouldn’t believe.”
ID is not religion. But even if we were to concede falsely that it is, such a characterization is irrelevant to the question of whether it is true.
Philosopher of science Thomas Kuhn compared scientific revolutions to political revolutions.
If anything is a “war on science,” it is publishing ideological articles like this in what is supposed to be a science journal.
Is not the fact that we are having these discussions the best available evidence that we are not “just overgrown apes or undergrown apes”?