Dawes and Smith say they’re simply describing (as a “matter of fact”) the history of science.
Newton was arguing from science, not religion. But that doesn’t fit the Epicurean mythos that religion opposes naturalism while science confirms it.
The LSEA demonstrates that we don’t have to teach evolution dogmatically in public schools.
Any genuine understanding of the impact AI will have (and is having) on humanity must begin with Girard.
When tyranny comes it often is introduced as some improvement, or as the correction of some perceived problem.