It wasn’t any religious concerns, Prager explains. It was the science.
At a debate in Chicago between Dawkins and Bret Weinstein, I witnessed something that I never thought I’d see.
A much better approach would be no religion in biology class, and more science.
Dawes and Smith say they’re simply describing (as a “matter of fact”) the history of science.
Newton was arguing from science, not religion. But that doesn’t fit the Epicurean mythos that religion opposes naturalism while science confirms it.