Obviously, these experiences point to something that is irrelevant to claims about evolution.
I suppose someone could try to explain why the challenge is unfair or not relevant to the field. That would be very difficult to do.
If Professor Dave watched to the end, he would have to confront the fact that he deceptively conscripted biochemist Bruce Lipshutz as an expert witness.
Have scientists made life in a laboratory? Two-thirds of the public think the answer is yes.
Over three subsequent posts, I’m going to elaborate on three reasons that we can see that Tour won, based upon a rhetorical analysis of the debate.