I found their review utterly convincing — although probably not in the way the authors might hope.
In a few days I will offer a detailed rebuttal. But here is the overwhelmingly important point to notice right up front.
Some form of dualism may well be a properly basic belief, justified by the universal human experience.
Bishop and O’Connor claim that in Darwin’s Doubt, my “analysis assumes that… mind is fundamentally immaterial.”
O’Connor and Bishop offer no evolutionary mechanism as an explanation for the origin of the information necessary to produce novel forms of life.