Tag: Response to Criticism
Cited to Attack Darwin Devolves, Study Devolves on Close Inspection
Pointing out the review’s many failings will be the work of multiple articles. Let’s start by zeroing in on just one segment.
Darwinists Devolve: Review by Swamidass, Lenski, and Lents Borders on Fraud
I found their review utterly convincing — although probably not in the way the authors might hope.
Woo-hoo! In Science Review of Darwin Devolves, Lenski Has No Response to My Main Argument
In a few days I will offer a detailed rebuttal. But here is the overwhelmingly important point to notice right up front.
How Not to Debate — Lawrence Krauss in Toronto
When someone opens what should be a scholarly debate with name-calling, innuendo, and accusations of dishonesty, it’s hard to respect that person.
Denying the Signature: More on Substance Dualism
Some form of dualism may well be a properly basic belief, justified by the universal human experience.