Tag: Retraction Watch
Science Is Self-Correcting? Time for a Reality Check
In the wake of the Stanford scandal, the reasons why science often ISN’T self-correcting are attracting much more attention.
Journal Finds It Can’t Keep a Good Pro-ID Paper Down
As a reader points out, the paper is the journal’s No. 1 most downloaded article, beating out several others in the Top 10 about Covid and related hot topics.
Corruption Watch: Biology Journal Blames the Innocent, Turns ID Scientists into Fall Guys
For those who are always lecturing us about “Follow the science” and “Believe the scientists,” this episode should be an eye opener.
Getting “Intelligent Design” Backward
That framing is backwards, or perhaps upside-down, probably in order to make the paper by Granville Sewell sound unreasonable.
Retraction Watch Guys Hallucinate “Intelligent Design” Yet Again
A helpful formulation comes from podcaster Scott Adams, of “Dilbert” fame, who comments entertainingly on the political scene.