What a peculiar thing to do. You invite someone for a “dialogue” and then, only once he’s left the building, do you start debating with him.
Every cosmology either has theistic implications, or ends up wrecking the basis for rational scientific investigation of nature.
Falk claims that Meyer misled his readers by not mentioning an allegedly significant newer result.
Why an avowedly Christian group would have its guns out for the God hypothesis is an interesting question from a psychological perspective.
Exactly how have the viewpoints at BioLogos been amended? Like a summer’s day in Seattle, it’s a bit cloudy — at least on the most interesting points.