Skip to content
Evolution News Logo

EVOLUTION NEWS

& SCIENCE TODAY

Menu
  • Science
      • EvolutionEvolution
      • MedicineMedicine
      • Human OriginsHuman Origins
      • Neuroscience and MindNeuroscience & Mind
      • Intelligent DesignIntelligent Design
      • Physics, Earth, and SpacePhysics, Earth & Space
      • Life SciencesLife Sciences
    Close
  • Culture
      • Culture & EthicsCulture & Ethics
      • NewsmediaNews Media
      • EducationEducation
      • Faith & ScienceFaith & Science
      • Free SpeechFree Speech
    • Close
  • Writers
      • casey-luskin-2020-tnCasey Luskin
      • Bioinformation SymposiumDenyse O’Leary
      • beheMichael Behe
      • paul-nelson-headshotPaul Nelson
      • wittJonathan Witt
      • ann-gauger-headshotAnn Gauger
      • douglas-axe-headshotDouglas Axe
      • michael-denton-headshotMichael Denton
      • stephen-meyer-headshotStephen Meyer
      • chaffee-1Sarah Chaffee
      • david-berlinski-headshotDavid Berlinski
      • john-west-headshotJohn West
      • Michael-Egnor-Stony-BrookMichael Egnor
      • smithWesley Smith
      • gsimmons-tnGeoffrey Simmons
      • david-klinghoffer-headshotDavid Klinghoffer
      • wellsJonathan Wells
      • dr_brian_miller_headshot-22Brian Miller
      • michael-flannery-headshotMichael Flannery
      • en-orange-boxEvolution News
    • Close
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Donate
  • About
  • Spanish Edition
  • 02.25.21
  • |
  • Search

Tag: Review

David Klinghoffer@d_klinghoffer
February 22, 2019, 1:59 PM

When Richard Lenski Is Finished Reviewing Darwin Devolves, Michael Behe Will Reply

Out of consideration for readers who want to judge the disagreements for themselves, that seems like the way to go.

David Klinghoffer@d_klinghoffer
February 21, 2019, 1:31 PM

Michael Behe: Darwinists Are “Famously Slow to Recognize Problems for Their Theory”

He is waiting patiently for them to catch up.

Evolution IconEvolution
Evolution News @DiscoveryCSC
October 24, 2018, 7:04 PM

Scientism: Irrational, Self-Refuting, and Contradictory

Yet it hangs over and around all of us like the air we breathe, says philosopher J.P. Moreland in a new book reviewed by Tom Gilson.

Evolution News @DiscoveryCSC
September 26, 2018, 4:19 AM

Response to Swamidass: Sniffing at 700+ Citations of Mainstream Scientific Literature

He focuses on one subtopic of one chapter, dismissing the rest of the scientific content of the book as failing to engage with mainstream science.

David Klinghoffer@d_klinghoffer
March 30, 2018, 2:47 AM

Sean McDowell: As an Introduction to Intelligent Design, Heretic Is a Top Pick

It’s surprising to reflect that no scientist up till now had fully shared his own experience in rethinking Darwinism.

Posts navigation

Page1 Page2 Page3 Next

Trending

  • What Subduction Teaches About Intelligent Design
  • Answering Another Objection to Intelligent Design: “You Can’t Prove God Exists”
  • Great Expectations: Origins in Science Education
  • Episode 3: James Tour Detonates “Hyperbole Surrounding Origin-of-Life Claims”
  • James Tour, Episode 4: On the Origin of Life, “The Devil Is in the Details”

Recommended

  • A Physician Describes How Behe Changed His Mind
  • Life’s Origin — A “Mystery” Made Accessible
  • Codes Are Not Products of Physics
  • Ixnay on the Ambriancay Plosionexhay
  • Design Triangulation: My Thanksgiving Gift to All
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Donate
  • About
  • Privacy
  • Search
© 2021 Discovery Institute