Tag: Reviewing Adam and the Genome
Adam and the Genome and “Predetermined Conclusions”
Buggs isn’t the only qualified biologist who has looked at arguments from MHC genes against Adam and Eve and found them lacking.
Adam and the Genome and Citation Bluffing
Yesterday, Douglas Axe responded to Dennis Venema’s review of Axe’s book Undeniable, pointing to what you might call citation bluffing.
Adam and the Genome and Human Genetic Diversity
Nobody in the ID community is capable of showing Dennis Venema to be wrong? Well, that’s a bit heavy on the attitude.
Adam and the Genome and “Nonfunctional” Pseudogenes
Venema cites the vitellogenin pseudogene as supposedly demonstrating common ancestry between humans and birds, such as chickens.
Adam and the Genome and Synteny
“Synteny refers to how well chromosomal sequences from different species align with one another.”