There is some evidence that once again, the diapason of opinion is being changed. The claims of intelligent design are too insistent and too plausible to be frivolously dismissed.
In Darwinist argumentation, Phillip Johnson found a panoply of euphemism and wishful thinking masquerading as evidence.
Amidst all this chest thumping over neo-Darwinian certainties, doubts are unmistakably on the rise.
In a new video for PragerU, Stephen Meyer recaps two big reasons to doubt the evolutionary account of life’s origins.
The design we infer in nature is an insight we abstract from our senses, but the inference itself is acquired by our reason.