At a debate in Chicago between Dawkins and Bret Weinstein, I witnessed something that I never thought I’d see.
A focus on power, to the neglect of wisdom, is fine, as long as it is recognized that mechanical philosophy is incomplete.
Recently, a team of British paleontologists added a new pseudo-explanation.
There are innumerable descriptions and definitions of theistic evolution. How things are phrased matters a lot.
In an excerpt from his new book, Professor Flannery identifies Darwin’s principal failing in developing his theory.