As the authors rigorously show, producing anything of significant complexity requires that knowledge of the outcomes be programmed into the search routines.
The pro-Darwin media love to print triumphalist articles, declaring on the thinnest of evidence that “creationists” are deathly scared of the latest science.
Those who think the evolution debate is just about evolution had better think again. It’s about the freedom of scientific discussion and inquiry.
As always, the work is solid and interesting, but is spun like a top to make it appear to support Darwinian evolution more than it does.
“A point of creation would be a place where science broke down. One would have to appeal to religion and the hand of God.” Guess who said that?