Computer methods of analyzing mutations are widely used because they are generally accurate. They do not suddenly lose their accuracy when I cite them.
Mike and Andrew have a good time considering the range of ways in which the preemptive, prepublication review fell short.
Not content with ripping Dr. Behe, Professor Lents now seeks to assassinate my character. Try to follow his logic if you can.
The dispute started when a review in Science proposed the 2012 article by Näsvall et al. as evidence against Mike Behe’s book Darwin Devolves.
Out of consideration for readers who want to judge the disagreements for themselves, that seems like the way to go.