Yes, Nathan Lents, finally we agree: it is “A good day for thoughtful discussion of evolution.”
Richard Lenski has spent decades overseeing the most extensive, most acclaimed laboratory evolution experiment conducted to date.
A very common way to try to discredit an argument is to exaggerate it, ignore distinctions an author makes, and/or change carefully qualified claims into bizarre absolutes.
In one paragraph Lents et al. twice cited sources they thought contradicted Behe, and twice suggested he ignored or dismissed contrary evidence.
Pointing out the review’s many failings will be the work of multiple articles. Let’s start by zeroing in on just one segment.