“Those 49 words — suggesting that students consult a library book if they wanted to learn more about a scientific idea — were too much for the thought police.”
An email correspondent who is friendly to intelligent design (ID) recently wrote us asking how to respond to common objections to ID arguments about the Cambrian explosion.
That there would be something unique about human origins isn’t what you would expect based on evolutionary assumptions.
If you’re going to engage people on the topic of intelligent design publications, don’t let them force two false assumptions on you.
In a series of lectures and articles, organic chemist James Tour has exposed how research related to the origin of life (OOL) has been scandalously misrepresented to the public.