Of course, there’s a page on the subject, and you guessed it, they deceptively minimize the theme of eugenics and racism in the book.
It’s always refreshing to find a journalist who has thought through the scientific issues related to intelligent design for himself.
Do critics of academic freedom have no better argument than this?
Today it’s the opponents of Darwinism who are fighting for academic freedom.
As always, the work is solid and interesting, but is spun like a top to make it appear to support Darwinian evolution more than it does.