Tag: Second Law of Thermodynamics
What Can a Mathematician Contribute to the Evolution Debate?
Sometimes it helps to step back from the details and look at the bigger picture.
Darwinists Take Refuge in Logically Invalid “Compensation” Argument
The seems to be something very unnatural about an advanced civilization arising from the dust of a barren planet.
From Andrew Breitbart’s “Big Government,” Malicious Ignorance on the Santorum Amendment
Grotesque distortions worthy of, well, the Huffington Post.
Are You Looking for the Simplest and Clearest Argument for Intelligent Design?
I consider this video to be the simplest and clearest presentation of that argument.
Materialists Beware: The First Gene Defends a Strictly Scientific, Non-Materialist Conception of Biological Origins
Can a book that is essentially devoid of the term “intelligent design,” doesn’t talk about “specified complexity,” and makes only scant mention of “irreducible complexity,” offer an argument that is friendly to teleology in biology? A new technical book, The First Gene, edited by Gene Emergence Project director David L. Abel, shows that the answer to that question is “yes.” Materialists will not like this book because its arguments are 100% scientific, devoid of religious, political, or cultural concerns, and most importantly, compelling. The arguments in The First Gene are rooted in what Abel calls “ProtoBioSemiotics” or “ProtoBioCybernetics,” which according to Abel answers questions like: How did a prebiotic natural environment of mere mass/energy interactions generate meaningful, functional messages? How Read More ›