The problem comes when, in order to win our acceptance, double-talk is used to pretend that a cult is something other than what it is.
Darwinism is supposed to be a universal theory about biological diversity advancing through reproduction. Could such a basic observation be beyond its scope?
We transcend the strictly material forces that spur natural selection. We, alone in the known universe, are moral beings.
A number of seminal papers have been published attempting to formalize Darwin’s biological theory from the point of view of computational sciences.
What do scientists spend more time thinking about — sex, or the theory of intelligent design?