Rosenhouse’s book is objectively bad. It purports to be a critique of mathematics as used by ID proponents and of my mathematical work in particular.
Consider a box with an internal divider such that the box is divided into two separate compartments, A and B.
Scientific data are followed by the myth: “Finch beak morphology observed on the Galápagos Islands was used by Darwin to formulate his theory of evolution.”
How could the authors suddenly do this? Some of the following points may be considered.
You may have noticed a strange loop which arises spontaneously in many sectors of the intelligent design debate.