I’m interested in “science as a cultural domain,” too. And here’s a great illustration of how the culture changes.
Back in 2008, Science published an influential research article claiming evidence for a physiological basis behind differences in political views.
No threat to science today is in any way comparable to that posed by the state church of post-modern naturalism.
The writer, among other errors, tries to associate the theory of intelligent design with Turkey’s recent action in banishing evolution from its public schools.
When even Slate turns against a “progressive” event like this weekend’s March for Science, you know something’s wrong.