Darwinists easily obtain a global microphone to rant against intelligent design, while ID advocates silently gain adherents. Is it a sign of desperation?
Yale computer scientist Dave Gelernter’s recent public admission that he’s giving up Darwin continues to make waves.
If what separates us from other animals were material in nature, material alone, then perhaps we could look to a material process for an explanation.
We’re constantly told that the design of the human larynx, trachea, and oral cavity is poor because it allows for choking on food.
In contrast with apes, it’s a tougher sell to say that dogs share an ability to communicate with us because of being close evolutionary cousins.