First, it is definitely NOT against either federal law or Supreme Court precedent to teach about scientific criticisms of Darwin’s theory.
Those of us in the community that seeks to advance the theory of intelligent design live in his presence every day. And we will continue to do so even following his death.
Watch an interview when he was healthy and you will see a man who swam in English like a dolphin loved water.
A Christianity Today obituary contains some misstatements about the law and legislative history regarding evolution education.
In Darwinist argumentation, Phillip Johnson found a panoply of euphemism and wishful thinking masquerading as evidence.