In one paragraph Lents et al. twice cited sources they thought contradicted Behe, and twice suggested he ignored or dismissed contrary evidence.
I found their review utterly convincing — although probably not in the way the authors might hope.
Kevin Williamson imagines that scientists are free to “slug it out” in journals and other academic settings, so that the truth reliably emerges.
Natural selection is not, after all, the one natural process in the universe that can make nature run backward.
Let’s just say that Michael Behe’s latest work has further refined his edge of evolution, in a highly significant way. Intrigued?