Tag: The Failures of Mathematical Anti-Evolutionism
The Silence of the Evolutionary Biologists
Intelligent design’s scientific program can, at least in part, be viewed as an attempt to unmask Darwinist credulity.
Jason Rosenhouse, a Crude Darwinist
As a fellow mathematician, I would have liked to see from Rosenhouse a vigorous and insightful discussion of my ideas.
The Challenge from Jason Rosenhouse
“The response would be a lot chillier if they tried the same arguments in front of audiences with the relevant expertise.” Is that so?
The Book That Launched a Thousand Barbs
Briefly, the design inference (the method rather than the book) identifies two features as essential for eliminating chance: improbability and specification.
Rosenhouse’s Blunder: Another Nonsensical Mathematical Argument Against Intelligent Design
Darwinist mathematician Jason Rosenhouse uses the analogy of a coin toss to defend the Darwinian explanation.