We still await serious critics who will successfully tell us in detail how our arguments and evidence go wrong.
Recently an atheist student emailed me to ask how it’s reasonable to claim that an “unobserved designer” is responsible for complex features of nature.
Recently I attended an informal philosophy discussion group including both theists and atheists.
You can’t keep claiming forever that ID is just “religion” or “politics” when the ID camp is producing legitimate science, and even non-ID scientists keep confirming ID’s predictions.
Critics of ID often allege that the term was invented by lawyers to get around the 1987 U.S. Supreme Court ruling Edwards v. Aguillard.