Cloning a human being is a terrifying prospect, from a moral perspective, and seems inevitable.
What is it, metaphysically one might say, that distinguishes design in the ID sense from ubiquitous teleological design, in a Thomistic sense?
Father Michael Chaberek helped me (a passionate but amateur Thomist!) understand an issue that perplexed me for years.
There is an ongoing debate about intelligent design in the Thomist system.
James Hudspeth, of Rockefeller University, just won the Norwegian Academy of Science’s Kavli Prize in science.