Tag: Undeniable: How Biology Confirms Our Intuition That Life Is Designed
Last Call for Intelligent Design Education Days, March 14 and 23, in Seattle and Dallas!
As a former STEM teacher, I think it’s safe to say that one of a science instructor’s biggest challenges is to instill in students an exciting and genuine sense of discovery through the scientific process.
Why Certainty Doesn’t Always Require Accuracy — A $5 Lesson in Probability
As our dialogue continues, I think I’m starting to understand your position more clearly.
Symposium? Or Firing Squad?
A symposium implies a diversity of perspectives with at least the reasonable hope of open minds, everyone arguing freely, and no one held back or held down while others pummel him.
Adam and the Genome and Citation Bluffing
Yesterday, Douglas Axe responded to Dennis Venema’s review of Axe’s book Undeniable, pointing to what you might call citation bluffing.
Losing the Forest by Fixating on the Trees — A Response to Venema’s Critique of Undeniable
I was asked recently to take part in an online symposium. The journal Sapientia, published by the Carl F.H. Henry Center, invited four theistic evolutionists to review my book.