These claims represent a classic but false “junk DNA” argument against intelligent design.
It’s simply false for Dawkins to claim that when you compare genes of different animals, they “fall on a perfectly hierarchy — a perfect family tree.”
For my part, I think it’s better to approach the data without assumptions and to let the evidence speak for itself.
Darwinism has a range of vulnerabilities, arguably including its assertion of universal common ancestry.
Lamoureux is the theistic evolutionist who left an indelible impression a couple of years ago when he debated Stephen Meyer and atheist Lawrence Krauss.